Skip to content
  • About

    About /

    • Who We Are
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Region Map
    • Committee
    • Bylaws
    • Awards
  • Training & Events

    Training & Events /

    • Trainings
    • Course Catalog
    • Events
    • Sponsorship
  • Membership

    Membership /

    • The CPOA Difference
    • Committees
    • President's Corner
    • Volunteer
  • Law & Legislation

    Law & Legislation /

    • Advocacy & Bill Positions
    • Meet Your Lobbyist
    • Jones Mayer
  • FOP Legal Defense
  • Careers
Member Login

Tag: Client Alert

Supreme Court “Ducks” Concerning Whether New York City Ordinance Imposing Travel Restrictions Upon Handgun Licensees Violates the Second Amendment

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel James R. Touchstone, Esq., Jones & Mayer In a 6-3 decision on April 27, 2020, the United States Supreme Court in N.Y. State Rifle & […]

Eighth Amendment Prohibits Prison Officials from Disregarding Known Substantial Risk of Serious Harm to Inmate

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel James R. Touchstone, Esq., Jones & Mayer On April 23, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Wilk v. Neven,[1] held that prison officials […]

PENAL CODE SECTION 632.7 PROHIBITS ONLY THIRD-PARTY EAVESDROPPERS. NOT THE PARTICIPANTS IN A PHONE CALL THEMSELVES, FROM INTENTIONALLY RECORDING TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATIONS

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel, James R. Touchstone, Jones & Mayer The California Fourth District Court of Appeal held, in Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.,[1] that a plaintiff failed to state […]

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT CONCLUDES THAT A SECRET RECORDING OF A PHONE CONVERSATION WAS NOT BARRED BY A PRIVACY PROVISION BECAUSE THAT PROVISION HAD BEEN REPEALED BY THE “RIGHT TO TRUTH-IN-EVIDENCE” PROVISION IN THE STATE CONSTITUTION

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel, James R. Touchstone, Jones & Mayer In the case of People v. Guzman,[1] the Supreme Court of California found that a surreptitious recording was properly […]

GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM APPROVES ASSEMBLY BILL 1600 AMENDING PITCHESS MOTION REQUIREMENTS

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel, Gregory P. Palmer and Veronica R. Donovan, Jones & Mayer On October 8, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom approved Assembly Bill 1600 (“AB 1600”) to amend […]

PLAINTIFF’S STATE RETALIATION CLAIM NOT PRECLUDED BY STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY’S DECISION

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel, James R. Touchstone, Jones & Mayer The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Bahra v. Cnty. of San Bernardino[1] that a state administrative agency’s […]

NINTH CIRCUIT RULES THAT DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN PRECLUDING TESTIMONY CONCERNING MENTAL ILLNESS OF DECEDENT OF WHICH OFFICER WAS UNAWARE AT TIME OF INCIDENT

Provided by CPOA Legal Counsel, James R. Touchstone, Jones & Mayer In the case entitled Crawford v. City of Bakersfield,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court’s […]

Membership

Discover the benefits of becoming a member today

Join CPOA
Thanks to our partners
Quick Links
  • About
  • Trainings & Events
  • Membership
  • Law & Legislation
  • About
  • Trainings & Events
  • Membership
  • Law & Legislation
Get In Touch
  • 2485 Natomas Park Dr #540
    Sacramento, CA 95833
  • (916) 263-0541
  • cpoa@cpoa.org

©2025. CPOA. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service